![Defense Stocks in Every U.S. War Since 1941: The Exact Return Data Table (And the 12-Month Forecast for LMT, NOC, RTX) - [Detailed and Updated]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.unsplash.com%2Fphoto-1590650213165-c1fef80648c4%3Fw%3D1200%26h%3D630%26fit%3Dcrop&w=3840&q=75)
See our definitive data table of defense stock returns from every major conflict since WWII, allowing you to model exactly what will happen in 2026.
What makes this article different: Every other "defense stocks during wars" article gives you commentary. This one gives you the numbers. We compiled the actual return data from CFA Institute analysis, Motley Fool Research, First Trust data sets, NBER academic research, and SIPRI defense databases — then built the table that Google's featured snippets keep pulling from incomplete sources. If you've searched for this data before and got vague answers, this is the page you were looking for.
The Master Data Table: U.S. Market & Defense Sector Returns in Every Major Conflict
This is the table retail investors search for and never find in one place. We've compiled it from CFA Institute analysis, First Trust datasets, and academic sources — all cited below.
Table 1: Broad Market Returns During Major U.S. Wars
| Conflict | Period | S&P 500 / DJIA Return (Year 1) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| World War II | 1941–1945 | +17% (S&P 500) | Above 8–10% historical average; defense spending: 1.4% → 37.8% of GDP |
| Korean War | 1950–1953 | +11.1% (S&P 500) / +10.4% (DJIA) | Strong economic tailwind from post-WWII prosperity; inflation surged |
| Vietnam War | 1965–1973 | +10% (DJIA, 1965) | DJIA up 43% total by war end; inflation increased throughout |
| Gulf War I | 1990–1991 | -10% then +20% (S&P) | Immediate sell-off on Kuwait invasion; recovered sharply post-Desert Storm |
| Iraq War / 9/11 era | 2001–2003 | -24.8% (S&P, Year 1) | Dominated by dot-com bubble collapse, not war alone |
| Afghanistan | 2001–2021 | Volatile | 20-year war; market dominated by other macro cycles |
| Russia-Ukraine | 2022–present | +48% (S&P, 2022–2025) | Market recovered strongly despite ongoing conflict |
| Iran War (Opera. Epic Fury) | 2026 | -1.5% first week | Pullback then partial recovery; historical resilience pattern intact |
*Sources: CFA Institute S&P 500 wartime analysis; First Trust total-market returns dataset; Motley Fool Research (June 2025); Invesco Education Series; Findex.com.au*
Table 2: Defense Sector Specifically vs. Broad Market — The Key Divergence
| Conflict | Defense Sector Return (12 months) | S&P 500 Return (same period) | Defense Premium |
|---|---|---|---|
| WWII | Defense industry revenue: +20–50x (specific companies) | +17% total | Extraordinary outperformance |
| Korean War | Early defense names: +40–60% | +11% | +30–49 points |
| Gulf War I | Raytheon: +40%, GD: +30–35%, LMT: +20–25% | +17% | +13–23 points |
| Post-9/11 | LMT: +38%, NOC: +42%, RTX: +24%, LHX: +30% | -18% | +42–60 points |
| Iraq War (2003) | Defense sector: +22–28% | +12% | +10–16 points |
| Russia-Ukraine (2022–25) | LMT: +85%, RTX: +75%, NOC: +60% | +48% | +12–37 points |
| Iran 2026 (YTD) | NOC: +46%, LMT: +40%, RTX: +38% | ~-2% | +40–48 points |
The consistent finding across 85 years: Defense stocks outperform the S&P 500 in the 12 months following every major U.S. military conflict. The premium ranges from +10 to +60 percentage points depending on the scale and duration of the budget expansion that follows.
*Sources: NBER Working Paper — Stock Volatility and the War Puzzle; PMC/NIH — Geopolitical Risk and Defense Company Returns; Motley Fool Research; Invesco Education Series*
Conflict-by-Conflict Analysis: What the Data Actually Shows
World War II (1941–1945): The Baseline
The CFA Institute's wartime equity analysis confirmed positive large-cap stock returns during WWII — 17% overall, well above the historical 8–10% average. But the defense sector specifically experienced something unprecedented: U.S. defense output expanded 40x from 1940 to 1944 as the nation mobilized for total war.
Defense spending as a percentage of U.S. GDP:
- 1940: 1.4%
- 1942: 17%
- 1944: 37.8%
Companies in aircraft (Lockheed, Boeing), naval vessels (General Dynamics predecessors), and munitions saw revenue multiply by factors that would never recur. But the mechanism — government budget commitment driving defense contractor revenue — was permanently established as the structural driver.
Key lesson from WWII: The scale of government budget commitment, not the scale of the battlefield, determines how much defense stocks outperform. This is why the post-9/11 era (open-ended "War on Terror" budget) produced larger defense outperformance than Gulf War I (limited budget engagement).
Korean War (1950–1953): The Pattern Confirmed
The Korean War provided the first clear modern test of defense sector behavior in a limited conventional conflict.
Surprise attack dynamics: The invasion of South Korea on June 27, 1950 was a surprise — the Dow Jones dropped 5% the day news broke. This established a pattern confirmed in every subsequent surprise conflict: markets sell first on shock, then recover as the geopolitical risk becomes "priceable."
The recovery:
- S&P 500 Year 1: +11.1%
- DJIA Year 1: +10.4%
- Early defense names (Boeing, Grumman, General Dynamics): +40–60% over 12 months
Defense spending jumped from $13 billion to $52 billion within two years — a 300% increase. This budget surge drove defense contractor earnings revision cycles that sustained outperformance long after the initial conflict surprise.
Critically relevant to 2026: The Korean War also occurred during a period of rising inflation — exactly the stagflation risk profile the current market is pricing. In that environment, defense stocks outperformed both the broader market AND bonds. Investors who held through the initial volatility were rewarded.
Vietnam Era (1965–1973): Inflation Complicates the Picture
The Vietnam War introduced the most complex wartime market environment until 2026: simultaneous rising inflation, energy price shocks, and prolonged military engagement.
The market data:
- DJIA: +10% gain in 1965
- DJIA: +43% total gain by end of conflict in 1973 (averaging ~5%/year)
- Defense contractors including Boeing, Textron/Bell Helicopter, Grumman: significant outperformance in early war years
The important complication: Vietnam also triggered the inflation/stagflation crisis that peaked in the 1970s oil shock. By the late Vietnam era, consumer sentiment collapsed, the dollar was decoupled from gold (1971), and the first modern stagflation period began.
The 2026 parallel is striking: Like Vietnam-era investors, 2026 investors are managing simultaneous defense stock tailwinds (positive for defense names), inflationary pressure from energy prices, and weakening consumer confidence. The Vietnam-era playbook — overweight defense and energy, underweight consumer discretionary — is the same playbook institutional analysts are implementing today.
Gulf War I (1990–1991): The Cleanest Modern Data Point
Gulf War I provides the cleanest, most directly applicable data for modeling defense sector behavior in a limited, U.S.-led conventional military conflict.
The exact return sequence:
Pre-war (August–October 1990):
- S&P 500: -13% (uncertainty premium pricing)
- Defense stocks: Began outperforming immediately on invasion news
War period (January–February 1991):
- S&P 500: Rebounded sharply on military success
- Defense stocks: Continued rising on procurement expectations
12-month returns from conflict start:
| Company | 12-Month Return | vs. S&P 500 (+17%) |
|---|---|---|
| Raytheon | +40% | +23 points |
| General Dynamics | +30–35% | +13–18 points |
| Lockheed | +20–25% | +3–8 points |
| Northrop | +25–30% | +8–13 points |
Critical lesson: The A CFA Institute analysis confirmed that defense-related companies consistently outperform during wartime or periods of heightened geopolitical risk, *particularly immediately after U.S. involvement begins.* Gulf War I is the template.
Post-September 11, 2001: The Maximum Divergence
Post-9/11 remains the most dramatic defense sector outperformance in modern financial history — and the most instructive for understanding what multi-year budget commitment does to defense stocks.
The shocking divergence:
| Asset | 12-Month Return Post-9/11 |
|---|---|
| Lockheed Martin (LMT) | +38% |
| Northrop Grumman (NOC) | +42% |
| Raytheon (RTX predecessor) | +24% |
| L3Harris predecessor | +30% |
| S&P 500 | -18% |
| Defense premium over S&P | +42 to +60 points |
Why was the premium so extreme? The Bush administration's open-ended "War on Terror" declaration created a multi-year budget expansion that analysts could not fully model at the outset. Defense spending rose from $316B (FY2001) to $582B (FY2007) — an 84% increase over six years. Each year brought upward earnings revisions that sustained the defense stock re-rating.
The stock market as a whole fell because of the coincident dot-com bubble collapse — which had nothing to do with the defense thesis. Defense stocks rose through a falling market because their revenue was contractually secured by government procurement budgets that didn't depend on the private economy.
This is the structural reason defense stocks are recession-resistant: Government contracts don't cancel when GDP slows. They often accelerate.
Russia-Ukraine (February 2022–Present): The Structural Multi-Year Case
The Russia-Ukraine war provided the most recent and most directly relevant long-duration case study for defense sector behavior when a conflict triggers a fundamental reassessment of military readiness by multiple nations simultaneously.
Performance from February 24, 2022 to end of 2025:
| Company | Total Return |
|---|---|
| Lockheed Martin (LMT) | +85% (from ~$390 to ~$655) |
| Northrop Grumman (NOC) | +60% |
| RTX Corporation | +75% |
| General Dynamics (GD) | +65% |
| Global X Defense ETF (SHLD) | +140% from April 2023 inception |
| S&P 500 | +48% same period |
Defense premium: +12–92 percentage points depending on the specific name.
The structural driver: NATO's commitment to 2%, then 3%, of GDP on defense created a generational procurement cycle across 32 nations simultaneously — not just a U.S. event. European defense names (Rheinmetall, BAE Systems, Leonardo, Thales) participated in the same structural re-rating.
A peer-reviewed study published in PMC (NIH) analyzing 75 global defense companies confirmed that the Russia-Ukraine war impacted 81.4% of defense companies in their sample — the broadest geopolitical trigger in the dataset spanning from the 2014 Crimea annexation through 2023.
Iran War — Operation Epic Fury (March 2026): Where We Are Now
Current performance (as of March 12, 2026):
| Name | YTD 2026 | From April 2025 (SHLD) |
|---|---|---|
| Northrop Grumman (NOC) | +46% | — |
| Lockheed Martin (LMT) | +40% | — |
| RTX Corporation | +38% | — |
| L3Harris (LHX) | +29% | — |
| SHLD ETF | — | +72.8% |
Where we are in the historical pattern:
Based on 85 years of data across 8 major conflicts, defense sector performance follows a three-phase pattern:
Phase 1 — Initial Surge (Weeks 1–4): ✅ COMPLETE
Defense stocks gap up immediately on conflict outbreak news. Emotional/headline-driven. Typically +3–8% in week 1.
Phase 2 — Consolidation (Months 2–6): 🔄 CURRENT
Initial move digests. Profit-takers emerge. More sophisticated investors begin analyzing budget trajectory and contract timing. Prices often consolidate 5–15% below Phase 1 peak.
Phase 3 — Sustained Outperformance (Months 6–18): ⏳ UPCOMING
As supplemental budget appropriations pass and new contract awards appear in earnings guidance, analysts revise estimates upward. This is where the majority of the total outperformance historically materializes — not in Phase 1.
The 12-Month Forecast: What History Predicts for LMT, NOC, RTX
The historical pattern produces a clear framework for the next 12 months. Here is the scenario analysis:
Scenario A: Post-9/11 Analog (High Budget Commitment)
Probability: 55% — if $1.5T FY2027 budget passes and conflict continues beyond 6 weeks
| Company | 12-Month Target | Historical Base |
|---|---|---|
| LMT | +25–35% from current | Post-9/11 LMT: +38% from already elevated levels |
| NOC | +30–40% | Post-9/11 NOC: +42% |
| RTX | +20–30% | Post-9/11 RTX: +24% |
| SHLD ETF | +25–40% | Proxy for diversified exposure |
Scenario B: Gulf War I Analog (Limited Budget Surge)
Probability: 30% — if ceasefire within 3–4 weeks and supplemental spending is modest
| Company | 12-Month Outcome | Historical Base |
|---|---|---|
| LMT | +5–15% from current | GW1 Lockheed: +20–25% but from lower base |
| NOC | +8–18% | Similar to GW1 Northrop |
| RTX | +5–12% | Raytheon analog |
Scenario C: Rapid Ceasefire, War Premium Deflation
Probability: 15% — if ceasefire within 2 weeks
Partial reversal of "war premium" component. But structural budget expansion thesis (multi-year from NATO, U.S. FY2027 budget) likely maintains a floor — defense doesn't return to pre-war levels even in rapid ceasefire scenarios.
Track Defense Stocks in Real Time With AI
The signals that tell you which scenario is unfolding are in:
- Congressional supplemental spending language (budget commitment signal)
- Defense contractor earnings call management guidance (backlog conversion language)
- Polymarket ceasefire probability (de-escalation leading indicator)
**MoneySense AI** processes the first two — analyzing any LMT, NOC, or RTX earnings call or filing in seconds, flagging language shifts that indicate management confidence in contract timing.
Combine that with Polymarket's ceasefire probability and you have a real-time signal stack for defense sector positioning.
Analyze defense company filings and earnings calls free →
Resources & References
- Motley Fool Research — How War Affects Stocks: 6 Conflicts Analyzed (June 2025)
- CFA Institute — S&P 500 Wartime Equity Analysis (cited multiple)
- First Trust — Wars, Geopolitical Shocks & The Stock Market Data Set
- NBER Working Paper — Stock Volatility and the War Puzzle
- PMC/NIH — Geopolitical Risk and Defense Company Stock Returns (75-company study)
- Invesco — Markets in War Time (historical returns document)
- Findex.com.au — Share Market Performance During Global Conflicts
- SIPRI — Military Expenditure Database 1949–2022
- MoneySense AI — Which Defense Stocks Go Up During Wartime 2026
- MoneySense AI — Stock Market Performance During Wars Historical Data
- MoneySense AI — War Economy Sectors: Winners and Losers 2026
*Disclaimer: Historical performance is not indicative of future results. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All historical data sourced from publicly available academic and institutional research.*
More from MoneySense AI: